| S2-0001 |
"As an """"off
shore"""" user the continuation of short wave is
important. " |
| S2-0002 |
reception reliableity on lower frequencies |
| S2-0003 |
none |
| S2-0004 |
qrm especially 10 mhz |
| S2-0005 |
more on the geo and radio |
| S2-0006 |
WWVB is pretty good ... it doesn't really need much
improvement but keeping it at full power would be nice for users further
away |
| S2-0007 |
Perhaps an eastern US transmitter would give us better
reception? |
| S2-0008 |
wwvb--extend to reliable coverage of east coast USA |
| S2-0009 |
no improvement |
| S2-0010 |
coverage |
| S2-0011 |
"Solar information is very valuable, as well as
propagation checks." |
| S2-0012 |
Increased power might be helpful......perhaps 3db. |
| S2-0013 |
Long-term commitment of radio service. |
| S2-0014 |
"WWVB coverage has gaps, such as in parts of Florida,
rendering the popular
""""atomic"""" clocks useless in
those areas" |
| S2-0015 |
Coverage |
| S2-0016 |
"More stability of the NIST Internet time servers, or
more of those servers that can be selected on the various programs so that
I can always get accurate time off some NIST server on the net." |
| S2-0017 |
"It may be technically impossible, but it would be
very nice to have a transmitter east of the Mississippi." |
| S2-0018 |
More frequent WX and Geophysics info |
| S2-0019 |
WWV voice is ususally only usable on 5 or 10 MHz nights
here in DC. Sometimes
nothing; at least the woodpecker is gone. |
| S2-0020 |
You never can have enough accuracy regarding time
services... |
| S2-0021 |
"protection from intereference, especially lids" |
| S2-0022 |
Coverage |
| S2-0023 |
"Coverage of 60 kHz transmitter. My
""""atomic clocks"""" do not
always achieve synchronization in the DC area." |
| S2-0024 |
none |
| S2-0025 |
a little more transmitter power would help in florida |
| S2-0026 |
I would to
hear a female announcer!! |
| S2-0027 |
coverage |
| S2-0028 |
keep it up |
| S2-0029 |
"Works beautifully as both a time and frequency check.
Don't """"fix"""" what isn't
broken." |
| S2-0030 |
I am also a musician and the 440 standard pitch is very
useful in tuning instruments and checking freq counters. I think if more
information were available to musicians it would be very useful. |
| S2-0031 |
wwvb coverage area |
| S2-0032 |
"Accuracy of WWV frequencies, as these are used as
""""standards"""" to check and
make calibrations. Internet
time clock should NEVER send data which might cause a computer to be
incorrect." |
| S2-0033 |
coverage of wwvb is better than it was - but could still be
improved for the east |
| S2-0034 |
?? |
| S2-0035 |
"I use several of the didgital automatic setting
clocks, I believe on the 60Khz. Here
in eastern Indiana sometimes we can go for several days with out some of
the clocks receiving a signal. Could
be the unit though. " |
| S2-0036 |
"Atmospheric conditions, but that is beyond your
ability." |
| S2-0037 |
"WWV - sometimes very hard to get decent reception,
also sometimes get interference from WWVH (SF Bay Area)" |
| S2-0038 |
More servers on Internet service |
| S2-0039 |
Thank you for the great service !! |
| S2-0040 |
WWVB (Coverage to East Coast)
Coverage is now just adequate but could be better.
Coverage) |
| S2-0041 |
Coverage |
| S2-0042 |
Possibly
the addition of another transmitter site to improve coverage area and
reception reliability. |
| S2-0043 |
"My needs are met now.
Your service is perfect for my""" |
| S2-0044 |
I would like to see an added geomagnetic activity report
(propagation report) added to the 18 minute after the hour report - maybe
at 48 after the hour. |
| S2-0045 |
WWVB is sometimes very hard to receive due to weak signals
and local electrical interference. A stronger signal into So. Ca. would be
an improvement. |
| S2-0046 |
They are all good |
| S2-0047 |
None |
| S2-0048 |
Improve Lower Frequency (2.5 mhz) coverage and range. |
| S2-0049 |
The system is fine the way it is! |
| S2-0050 |
Excellent as is. |
| S2-0051 |
WWV & WWVH need to remain on the air !!! |
| S2-0052 |
"You need to get rid of what appears to be a German SW
religious station on 10mhz, mainly at 0000z nightly...." |
| S2-0053 |
"Backup to all systems, including transmitter,
support, and people. National interests
are now using these systems. Negative impact if th""" |
| S2-0054 |
WWV Transmitter and Antennas |
| S2-0055 |
coverage area |
| S2-0056 |
I like the service as it is currently |
| S2-0057 |
"5, 10, & 15 MHz should have increased TX power
and/or better antenna network for higher ERP" |
| S2-0058 |
"I feel the service is great, please do not cut any
service." |
| S2-0059 |
The HF frequencies you now use are quite adequate for my
needs. I am well pleased and
can offer no suggestions for improvement. |
| S2-0060 |
more power on the transmitters and direction |
| S2-0061 |
None |
| S2-0062 |
none |
| S2-0063 |
Better MF/HF coverage in Atlantic Ocean and Caribbean Sea. |
| S2-0064 |
nONE |
| S2-0065 |
"On the HF bands, I often get interference from people
chatting on the 10 MHz frequency, and more rarely on the others.
They mostly appear to be from South America." |
| S2-0066 |
WWVB coverage area and signal strength & quality |
| S2-0067 |
I am happy with the present service |
| S2-0068 |
Better coverage in the eastern US on 2.5 and 20 MHZ. |
| S2-0069 |
Reception reliability |
| S2-0070 |
Ones available are fine |
| S2-0071 |
"None, the service is great just the ay it is." |
| S2-0072 |
High Frequency [10 or 15 MHz] are sometimes unreliable due
to solar activity here in MA |
| S2-0073 |
better coverage of 60KHZ signal on the east coast |
| S2-0074 |
keep as is |
| S2-0075 |
Interference reduction on HF frequencies. I hear a lot of interfering voices (Spanish). |
| S2-0076 |
None |
| S2-0077 |
I like it fine. Nice
Job |
| S2-0078 |
"20 mHz Hawaii would be nice, as different frequencies
indicate propagation. Sometimes
special announcements are cut off before complete." |
| S2-0079 |
I'm
plenty happy with things as they currently exist. |
| S2-0080 |
upgrade nisttime 32 packet collisions and server overload
are a problem at busy times at times |
| S2-0081 |
none |
| S2-0082 |
"reception, hard to hear somedays and understand" |
| S2-0083 |
Stronger
signals on 60 kHz to New England - to make reception reliable 24 hours a
day |
| S2-0084 |
"WWVB Now
that WWVB clocks are more common on the retail market, reception
relaibility is more of an issue. I
now have (4)WWVB clocks, and gnereally only one or two will be
""""in-sync"""" with WWVB.
I assume it is just a reception problem." |
| S2-0085 |
everything works great! Don't change a thing! |
| S2-0086 |
Improve reception reliability on 20 MHz |
| S2-0087 |
WWVB coverage |
| S2-0088 |
Not always easy to hear WWV in Massachusetts. |
| S2-0089 |
Please keep all of your current services and broadcast
distribution modes. |
| S2-0090 |
Improved Signal Strength |
| S2-0091 |
WWVB reception reliability. |
| S2-0092 |
stability |
| S2-0093 |
INCRASE OUTPUT POWER TO IMPROVE RCEPTION RELIABILITY WITHIN
THE EXISTING COVERAGE AREA |
| S2-0094 |
none i am pleased to have what is available as it is.and i
thank you for it |
| S2-0095 |
Limited use for educational purposes. No immediate
improvements foreseen. |
| S2-0096 |
Voice reception over the ticks. |
| S2-0097 |
"Please finish fixing the antennas on WWVB.
I have had to move all my atomic clocks to make them receive you at
least 50% of the time and before, they *always* worked!" |
| S2-0098 |
"I would say that everything's pretty much OK now, if
you can just maintain the status quo." |
| S2-0099 |
"None, Doesn't need much changing." |
| S2-0100 |
Some
days coverage is very weak and CHU provides better signal. Most of the
time the WWV is very readable. |
| S2-0101 |
clearer transmission of bulletins; sometimes the announcer
is overmodulated and distorted |
| S2-0102 |
Strength of signal. It
drifts off at the top of the time signal in my area. |
| S2-0103 |
I am happy with all of them. |
| S2-0104 |
Your service is just fine as it is. |
| S2-0105 |
reception reliability |
| S2-0106 |
Happy with all aspects of service as it presently exists |
| S2-0107 |
"Some frequencies are unusable due to propagation. At
this time of the cycle, 25
MHz needs to be re-activated." |
| S2-0108 |
No problems here. |
| S2-0109 |
Very happy with existing services.
The Internet service would be more flexible if there was more
extensive firewall support. |
| S2-0110 |
"I have clocks that use WWVB to update time. Even with
the higher WWVB power level, the reliability
at only 500 miles distance isn't great for clocks in a noisy environment
like an office
building." |
| S2-0111 |
2.5 MHz needs a big increase in power |
| S2-0112 |
2.5 MHz needs a big increase in power |
| S2-0113 |
Service
is good now.....Can't think of anything you need to do to improve it... |
| S2-0114 |
"WWVB coverage, especially in the eastern and upper
midwest of US. As more
automatic uses of WWVB become commonplace, the coverage issue will have
more importance." |
| S2-0115 |
all I use are very reliable |
| S2-0116 |
all I use are very reliable |
| S2-0117 |
60 KHZ is tough to get a good signal underground on the
east coast. NY State for
auto clock update. |
| S2-0118 |
"doing fine on shortwave coverage, nothing
needed" |
| S2-0119 |
I have no problems with the service as is |
| S2-0120 |
WWVB for automatic setting of clock is marginal. Any RF
noise will cause the clocks to not sync for days. |
| S2-0121 |
"As we are so far from WWV,
send a bit of the WWVH signal to the East! The pattern favoring out to the West is excellent,
but maybe you could mess it up bit so some more signal comes West." |
| S2-0122 |
HF Services are excellent.
Please don't change a thing! |
| S2-0123 |
like it and find it useful just as it is |
| S2-0124 |
The service is fine -- and has been for years! |
| S2-0125 |
Annoucement of Solar conditions more often than once an
hour. |
| S2-0126 |
The service does all I need |
| S2-0127 |
Interference on 10 MHz in latin America. I will add more
power |
| S2-0128 |
"web page, additional servers/bandwidth" |
| S2-0129 |
higher accuracy not dependant on internet delay for the
internet based services |
| S2-0130 |
Service is wonderful |
| S2-0131 |
20mc is very poorly rcvd here. |
| S2-0132 |
It is hard to find the time service on the web. Make it a
front page link item for goodness sakes from www.nist.gov. The web page
seems awful slow. |
| S2-0133 |
More information about the geo indices would be appreciated |
| S2-0134 |
I feel a East Coast Transmitter site would also be
advantageous. Maybe we the VOA site used to be in Bethany OHIO. |
| S2-0135 |
"I have clocks that use WWVB to update time. Even with
the higher WWVB power level, the reliability
at only 500 miles distance isn't great for clocks in a noisy environment
like an office
building." |
| S2-0136 |
I find the services of WWV very useful for audible time
source and marker frequency for maintaining operating freqnency of HF
transceivers. No improvements
or changes desired!!! |
| S2-0137 |
"Glad to have WWVB back up to full power. Could not
receive in 60657/Chicago, IL on one of my two clocks when you were on
partial power (god bless radio shack)." |
| S2-0138 |
Better
reception reliability for automatic time setting clocks. |
| S2-0139 |
none |
| S2-0140 |
What is provided is very adequate for my casual use. |
| S2-0141 |
"None that I can say. I have injoyed and use the Radio
Frequecies on 2.5, 5.0, 10.,15., 7 20. FOR 47 YEARS IN DAILY aMATEUR rADIO
AND cOMMERCIAL cOMMUNICATIONS." |
| S2-0142 |
20MHz would improve reception here in Philippines |
| S2-0143 |
wwvl Coverage |
| S2-0144 |
Better HF and LF signal strength to Florida |
| S2-0145 |
n/a |
| S2-0146 |
solar flux 2x per hr |
| S2-0147 |
more timely updates of solar flare activities on wwv and or
wwvh stations |
| S2-0148 |
None |
| S2-0149 |
WWVB's signal in the San Francisco area is weak compared to
signal levels I detect when in Southern California or Oregon. |
| S2-0150 |
GeoAlerts More Frequently Announced |
| S2-0151 |
I think things are sufficient now......... |
| S2-0152 |
vitally
important as is in Amateur Radio Service |
| S2-0153 |
none |
| S2-0154 |
no suggestions on this. |
| S2-0155 |
None |
| S2-0156 |
stronger signal |
| S2-0157 |
The weather voice might be much morer useable if the
readers voice was trained in hi-noise HF communications. Most people don't
use it because it is so poorly read. |
| S2-0158 |
don't know |
| S2-0159 |
"WWVB 60kHz needs higher field strength, regional
repeaters? A new VLF service on a carrier that is not harmonically related
to 60 Hz power line and the high RFI that is generated by power
line driven appliances should be adopted.
" |
| S2-0160 |
None - Serves my amateur radio purposes perfectly. |
| S2-0161 |
stronger signal from WWVB on east coast |
| S2-0162 |
AM/SSB audio service from WWV Boulder needs more power or
better antenna pattern coverage |
| S2-0163 |
Better Coverage especially during daylight hours. |
| S2-0164 |
Generally
pretty satisfied with information provided - Propagation (frequency for
reception) biggest problem...sometimes have to hunt for the signal. |
| S2-0165 |
Better publication of range of services and subsequent
enhancements. |
| S2-0166 |
"None, thanks for the great service I've enjoyed over
the years" |
| S2-0167 |
Reactivate WWV 25 MHz and WWVH 20 MHz.
Excelent propagation monitor during solar peaks. |
| S2-0168 |
10 MHz reception |
| S2-0169 |
Better WWVB coverage. The signal is a bit weak north of the
St Lawrence River in Ontario but usable. |
| S2-0170 |
Better signal strength in New England states |
| S2-0171 |
coverage |
| S2-0172 |
N/A |
| S2-0173 |
Atomic clocks have very hard time tracking weak signal. |
| S2-0174 |
Expanding coverage and signal strength at 60kHz |
| S2-0175 |
For my purposes the service is fine as is. |
| S2-0176 |
winter
night time reception is sometimes difficult with 2.5 the only option or
wwvh. |
| S2-0177 |
on air reception for Ham radio |
| S2-0178 |
10 Mhz Output for equipment calibration...more coverage
would be nice |
| S2-0179 |
"Looking at your survey, I need education as to what
is available!" |
| S2-0180 |
"never tried the internet or phone services,, more
toward teaching average public of services" |
| S2-0181 |
Improved coverage of 10 MHz.
Unfortunately this means
higher power. |
| S2-0182 |
Work on improving radio coverage for an area to include at
least two bands on a simple shortwave radio for the entire USA. |
| S2-0183 |
WWV
skywave elevation angles on HF should be increased to provide higher
angle(NVIS)/ closer coverage to FT. Collins. |
| S2-0184 |
"shortwave reception at 5, 10, 15, 20mhz for Arizona.
" |
| S2-0185 |
I would like to see the time of day broadcast service
continue. It is useful for
gauging propagation as well as being the time standard. |
| S2-0186 |
60 Khz Stronger
signal for building penetration. |
| S2-0187 |
Radio audio reception power |
| S2-0188 |
"WWV and WWVH: Repeat the Solar Flux, A and K index
and Geomagnetic information more often" |
| S2-0189 |
None I receive
broadcasts very well here in Central Florida |
| S2-0190 |
Better reception on all bands |
| S2-0191 |
I recently purchased a clock made to receive the 60khz
signal from WWVB. It was over a week before it received the signal. I
acknowledge it was not an expensive device and that I am a long way from
Colorado (here in Central Massachusetts). |
| S2-0192 |
"in Las Vegas, Nv my wwvb clock misses once per day
reception at least twice per week." |
| S2-0193 |
|
| S2-0194 |
"Sunspot, A & K indices more frequently than
1/hour" |
| S2-0195 |
More GEO broadcasts would be a good thing. |
| S2-0196 |
Keep Geo alerts. Very
valuable. |
| S2-0197 |
I think WWV is excellent as is. |
| S2-0198 |
"ACTS has never worked for me. when I try to set the
time, I receive an error that says that there is no server selected, even
though I have one selected" |
| S2-0199 |
"WWV and WWVH: Broadcast solar flux, A and K index and
geomagnetic information every 10 minutes" |
| S2-0200 |
none |
| S2-0201 |
geomagnetic indices reported more than once an hour |
| S2-0202 |
Perhaps better coverage. It may also be that I need to
improve my antenna |
| S2-0203 |
Better
coverage and more power on the WWVB signal.
Way more power. |
| S2-0204 |
Sometimes the voice announcements on WWV seem very poorly
edited and do not fit the time slots allocated. A message will be cut off
because it runs too long. |
| S2-0205 |
works fine for me as is. |
| S2-0206 |
wwvb coverage |
| S2-0207 |
Reliable reception of NIST signals from station WWV at all
times of the day. |
| S2-0208 |
coverage |
| S2-0209 |
Maybe propagation information included along with the GEO
alerts. |
| S2-0210 |
"In my location, I have never (to the best of my
memory), failed to get the time service I needed via HF radio.
Also our clocks that automatically track the time
""""radio controlled"""" have no
problems syncing into the system. Portland,
OR area. " |
| S2-0211 |
Realiable availability of WWVB on the whole US territory |
| S2-0212 |
I don't really feel there is any need for improvement to
the services I access. |
| S2-0213 |
Present service suits my needs. |
| S2-0214 |
The 10 MHz WWV frequency oftern has interference
fromSpanish speaking ststions. The State Dept and the FCC need to get
involved |
| S2-0215 |
none |
| S2-0216 |
None - already
excellent |
| S2-0217 |
I am satisfied |
| S2-0218 |
"More info on WWV such as flare class, coronal mass
ejections, and MUF (maximum usable frequency)." |
| S2-0219 |
The first tick of the hour needs to be more destinctive. |
| S2-0220 |
More
detailed info on WWV concerning the class of solar flares and coronal mass
ejections and whether they are headed toward the earth. MUF info would be
helpful. Any digitized voice should be of the highest quality - don't
skimp! |
| S2-0221 |
n/a |
| S2-0222 |
I would like to see the solar index report given more
often. |
| S2-0223 |
|
| S2-0224 |
n/a |
| S2-0225 |
With the choice of frequencies available it is reliable as
is. |
| S2-0226 |
I would like to see the solar index report given more
often. |
| S2-0227 |
I would like to see the solar index report given more
often. |
| S2-0228 |
More info on the class of flares and coronal mass ejections
and whether they are headed toward earth. |
| S2-0229 |
"None Happy with as is, generally use only shortwave
to access, can generally access one or more frequencies at any time.
Seldom use the internet but it is available." |
| S2-0230 |
web |
| S2-0231 |
None |
| S2-0232 |
"WWVB Power and antenna for nationwide coverage needs
improvement, but is better than before" |
| S2-0233 |
"None, I strongly believe that WWV is doing a great
job! Please do not cut back
on current service." |
| S2-0234 |
none - keep up the standard |
| S2-0235 |
Just keep up the fine work for now. |
| S2-0236 |
"WWVH radio reception reliability/coveragfe area in
case WWV is in bad propagation, or down" |
| S2-0237 |
"General keeping up with technology, and keeping
service releiable and accessible." |
| S2-0238 |
works good as is for me |
| S2-0239 |
increased frequency of geo alerts |
| S2-0240 |
n/a |
| S2-0241 |
more frequent geo alert announcement. |
| S2-0242 |
Adequate for my needs as is. |
| S2-0243 |
more-regular ID of location of HF transmitters |
| S2-0244 |
We use time/interval and time of day at many different
locations/buildings on three campuses so we like to use the WWVB time
information for our clocks. Telephones and web accessable computers are
not at each instrument's location. |
| S2-0245 |
Status Quo is good. |
| S2-0246 |
More frequent solar indicies reports |
| S2-0247 |
signal strength coverage |
| S2-0248 |
none |
| S2-0249 |
Audio level for Solar activity/Magnetic field activity from
WWVH are much lower than WWV. This makes copy difficult under marginal
signal levels |
| S2-0250 |
"None, I think service is excellent!" |
| S2-0251 |
Fine the way it is. |
| S2-0252 |
perhaps another station for greater and more reliable
reception |
| S2-0253 |
reception |
| S2-0254 |
None |
| S2-0255 |
More power on 2.5 and 5 MHz (WWV).
Finish the WWVB project. |
| S2-0256 |
none |
| S2-0257 |
The services I use do not need improvement. Just be sure
that they are continued. |
| S2-0258 |
It is good as it is! |
| S2-0259 |
It's not broken...don't fix it!! |
| S2-0260 |
10 mHz voice quality is sometimes difficult to pickup |
| S2-0261 |
Time zones other than just the U.S. |
| S2-0262 |
BRING BACK 25 MHZ |
| S2-0263 |
wwvb coverage |
| S2-0264 |
WWV HF fading. |
| S2-0265 |
I
would like to see an increase in the output power of the station in
general. |
| S2-0266 |
We are in Seattle at the fringe of WWVB coverage. Thus we
would like improved WWVB signal strength. |
| S2-0267 |
"wwvb, wwv" |
| S2-0268 |
"Coverage and reception quality of broadcast services.
While recption is generally adequate on at least one frequency at my
location, better reception on 2 or more would enhance reliability." |
| S2-0269 |
I really appreciate the WWV radio service for more than 30
years now |
| S2-0270 |
no suggestions |
| S2-0271 |
None - Very satisfied |
| S2-0272 |
Keep on doin' whatcha been doin' for the past half century. |
| S2-0273 |
I've been very pleased with the current NIST Time and Frequency services and see no need for
any significant improvements. |
| S2-0274 |
None |
| S2-0275 |
Reception Reliability:
Certain times of day both WWV and WWVH are very difficult to
receive. |
| S2-0276 |
"Not so much improvement, but keep the services from
going away. They are good and
should be kept!" |
| S2-0277 |
WWVH would be improved by a signal at 20 mHz. |
| S2-0278 |
Better signal coverage in Ohio on 10 mhz for frequency standard calibrations |
| S2-0279 |
"SFI, A and K index reports 4 times an hour would be
nice." |
| S2-0280 |
Coverage |
| S2-0281 |
none |
| S2-0282 |
More power on WWVH |
| S2-0283 |
a clearer voice |
| S2-0284 |
better coverage area |
| S2-0285 |
mostly none... but bigger antennas would improve reception
in geo storms |
| S2-0286 |
I'm satisfied with the service as-is. |
| S2-0287 |
"More lines should be added to the telephone service,
so that you don't get cut off after 90 seconds. Other than that it is
perfect. Please keep the phone calls free if possible. They are
indispensable." |
| S2-0288 |
WWV coverage |
| S2-0289 |
Some information could be repeated more than once an hour -
in order not to have to wait an hour for the next update. |
| S2-0290 |
WWV has always done a great job. |
| S2-0291 |
stability and coverage |
| S2-0292 |
None |
| S2-0293 |
I'm happy with the service as is. |
| S2-0294 |
"I'm happy with things as they are. At least one of
the services (the frequency standard), which is essential for keeping my
amateur radio transmitter calibrated, is not available to me in any way
other than WWV/WWVH." |
| S2-0295 |
"all OK so Far, Reception sometimes bad" |
| S2-0296 |
None |
| S2-0297 |
"The service meets my needs as is, except for
reception issues." |
| S2-0298 |
reception |
| S2-0299 |
fine |
| S2-0300 |
The 2.5 MHz is the noisiest portion of the HF spectrum and
not too many people have antennas that can pick WWV\WWVH well on 2.5 MHz.
Perhaps either increase the power or drop that frequency coverage. |
| S2-0301 |
"broadcast the propagation data (solar flux, etc) more
frequently than once per hour , ie: every 15 minutes would be great
!" |
| S2-0302 |
"Improve reception reliability of HF stations on the
West Coast USA. Add 25MHz and
boost power on 2.5MHz, 5.0 MHz. Thanks" |
| S2-0303 |
I would like to see the solar index report given more
often. |
| S2-0304 |
Increase effective radiated power for WWV. |
| S2-0305 |
Current services satisfy my needs |
| S2-0306 |
Increase power on 10 mHz. by 6 dB. Drop 20 Mhz. station |
| S2-0307 |
"A stronger signal would be nice especially WWVH. Also
it would be nice to have the weather, Geo alerts, and Gps status,
broadcast 2 or 3 tmes per hour instead of just one time.
" |
| S2-0308 |
"WWVH needs to operate at 20Mhz. How come the 20Mhz
antenna was terminated and operation closed? I can hear WWV on 20Mhz
during the day, not at night.
Why? When TDY in Seattle, WWV was weak reception, Why? " |
| S2-0309 |
STABILITY |
| S2-0310 |
The services I use seem to work fine. |
| S2-0311 |
"Actually, your current services fully meet my needs
as a private user." |
| S2-0312 |
ADD back 25 Mhz service. |
| S2-0313 |
Power increase on 2.5 MHz. for better Eastern U.S.
coverage. More tropical
weather bulletins from the National Hurricane Center. |
| S2-0314 |
none |
| S2-0315 |
Better coverage to the NE US. |
| S2-0316 |
most part not much I beilve on HF more power certain area
it harder to pick up |
| S2-0317 |
"GEO Alerts could be transmitted more frequently,
possibly 2 or 3 times per hour." |
| S2-0318 |
"none, very satisified." |
| S2-0319 |
I find the time services to be of great help. |
| S2-0320 |
I find that reception in the Central Ohio area is weak
depending on atmospheric conditions.
The 10Mhz time signals are currently the most reliable. Either additional power or antenna configuration could
improve signals. |
| S2-0321 |
WWVB - more power or something to make coverage more
reliable |
| S2-0322 |
OK as is. Will leave this to the engineers |
| S2-0323 |
I'm satisfied with the current service - I wouldn't want to see a decrease in quality. |
| S2-0324 |
Rid the frequencies of illegal SSB operators. |
| S2-0325 |
"We are generally pleased with service, features and
accuracy." |
| S2-0326 |
Civerage |
| S2-0327 |
add more hourly geo reports |
| S2-0328 |
"reception reliability, but that is usually beyond our
control - you can't control the ionosphere!" |
| S2-0329 |
"if is not broke, don't fix it." |
| S2-0330 |
need more WWVB to synchronize my Rubidium to.. |
| S2-0331 |
coverage or reception reliability (same in my opinion) |
| S2-0332 |
I'm very satisfied with the service |
| S2-0333 |
"The internet time service is nice, but I have only
been able to get it to work on Win95, and not through firewalls. When using it on Win98 it sets the clock to the wrong time,
date and year" |
| S2-0334 |
"would like to see more frequent geophysical
announcements ( A, K , Planetray indexes) rather than once an hour.
HF radio propagation forcast would be very useful. " |
| S2-0335 |
WWVB coverage in the Northeastern US.
Also add checksum or parity bits to signal. |
| S2-0336 |
Go back to human voice transmission. |
| S2-0337 |
Greater
reception reliability on the medium wave bands would improve service. |
| S2-0338 |
Geo alerts more often |
| S2-0339 |
TO
LET US KNOW WHIN WWV IS GOING TO BE OFF THE AIR ON 2.5 5 10 AND 15 KHZ AND
HOW LONG THEY WILL BE OFF THE AIR |
| S2-0340 |
"More reliable 5, 10, 15 mhz reception on east
coast." |
| S2-0341 |
More often GEO conditions/alerts |
| S2-0342 |
WWVH needs a more powerful transmitter |
| S2-0343 |
"My WWV broadcast receiver will sometimes not pick up
your voice signal in OKC,OK." |
| S2-0344 |
None |
| S2-0345 |
Just the reception. |
| S2-0346 |
"Night reception in Southern CA is not reliable, and
generally similar in Northern CA" |
| S2-0347 |
all is okay as is... |
| S2-0348 |
"WWV coverage in the """"skip
zone"""" 80-120 miles from the WWV transmitter." |
| S2-0349 |
None at all |
| S2-0350 |
Higher power transmitter |
| S2-0351 |
"Stability, but we get that with gps reference." |
| S2-0352 |
WWV coverage in the midwest needs improvement |
| S2-0353 |
WWV-Reception proved unreliable in the eastern Pacific near
lattitude 15N to 7N |
| S2-0354 |
improvement in signal strength |
| S2-0355 |
Automated
updating clocks using WWVB service is on the increase.
It is a wonderful service. The
only problem is availability and reliability of signals. |
| S2-0356 |
Geo
alerts do not seem to reflect the present propagation conditions on the HF
bands. |
| S2-0357 |
better signal
strength on 5 10 and 15 Mhz |
| S2-0358 |
More detailed geo alert data |
| S2-0359 |
keep it like it is now |
| S2-0360 |
none |
| S2-0361 |
More than adequate for my usage |
| S2-0362 |
More coverage. |
| S2-0363 |
"Coverage, anything that will improve the
service." |
| S2-0364 |
"The present service is very good. Perhaps better
signal on 10Mhz, although most of my problems are usually related to
propagation issues. " |
| S2-0365 |
Could 25 MHz transmissions be brought back? |
| S2-0366 |
Coverage Area is spoaradic |
| S2-0367 |
"Considering that both WWV and WWVH are in the western
United States, NOW, a third transmitter should be added for continual
coverage in the eastern United States. Often, I have to try to find CHU,
when I cannot receive WWV or WWVH." |
| S2-0368 |
"None, I don't think improvement is needed." |
| S2-0369 |
The ability to receive a signal in remote places could use
some improvement |
| S2-0370 |
WWVB |
| S2-0371 |
"I have an Oregon Scientific WWVB receiver clock, and
it works ok, but I can't suggest a coverage improvement without knowing
where your repeaters/transmitters in the East are. I live in
Alabama." |
| S2-0372 |
I am happy with current services |
| S2-0373 |
currently suits my applications |
| S2-0374 |
"Stronger signals from WWV on 5, 10 and 15 MHz. My
most reliable freq (day & night) is 10. If it was stronger, I
would not need the others. Skip
conditions make 5 unusable days; 15 poor nights.
I'm in San Jose, California. " |
| S2-0375 |
"I know you raised the power of WWVB, but it still has
trouble with the high noise floor in Los Angeles." |
| S2-0376 |
More often solar updates |
| S2-0377 |
"For my use in frequency checkes on transceiver,
present services are satisfactory" |
| S2-0378 |
Im very satisfied |
| S2-0379 |
The services I use are very good and work fine for me.
I can't think of any pressing improvements that need to be done. |
| S2-0380 |
none |
| S2-0381 |
"Voice announcements are not always intelligble, even
though they are repeated. Maybe
the summary reports could be read using phonetics and/or counted out (e.g.
""""K= three; one-two-three"""").
" |
| S2-0382 |
WWVB erp needs boosted to better cover SE US and Alaska
time zone. |
| S2-0383 |
"from my perspective, you're doing great! don't change anything" |
| S2-0384 |
"As stated above, coverage area for your lower
frequencies (2.5, 5 Mhz)." |
| S2-0385 |
coverage |
| S2-0386 |
"Frankly, none" |
| S2-0387 |
Increase the daytime power of the 10 MHZ station to provice
better reception in the EASTERN USA. |
| S2-0388 |
I feel your services are very satisfactory |
| S2-0389 |
"It is probably impossible on a packet switched
network such as the public internet, but the time delay introduced by the
network affects the accuracy of the received time of day on the
internet." |
| S2-0390 |
"Would like to havre Geoalert info several times in an
hour. If I miss 18 past the
hour, I have to wait another hour." |
| S2-0391 |
Perhaps a higher power-output of radio stations. |
| S2-0392 |
None |
| S2-0393 |
WWV broadcasts could use more power sometimes. In early morning in N. Wisconsin I found signals very weak
once. I understood from
others local to the area that this was not uncommon. |
| S2-0394 |
Shortwave and WWVB need a bit more power |
| S2-0395 |
"Announcement of solar flux,
""""A"""" and
""""K"""" index values more than
once per hour." |
| S2-0396 |
Presently satisfctory for my needs |
| S2-0397 |
Stronger signal in up state New York |
| S2-0398 |
no comment |
| S2-0399 |
"Internet service isn't too reliable due to ISP and
networking problems. Shortwave
is there when I need it, especially when traveling and away from my
computer." |
| S2-0400 |
"The WWV needs more stability,transmit power,improved
coverage and reception." |
| S2-0401 |
"Generally a higher power level on 5, 10, 15 to
increase reliable reception. " |
| S2-0402 |
More ERP to WWV and WWVH |
| S2-0403 |
Additional propagation information; SSN as well as SF |
| S2-0404 |
Improve the reception |
| S2-0405 |
reception |
| S2-0406 |
I use the WWV signal to set the time for a computer-guided
telescope. Improved signal strength in Western Pennsylvania would be nice.
I also use the signal for self-setting clocks at home and in the office. |
| S2-0407 |
"GEO Alerts, needs better coverage" |
| S2-0408 |
"gps,weather and propgation every 15 mins." |
| S2-0409 |
Please restore WWV broadcasts on 25 MHz as in the 1960s. |
| S2-0410 |
Eliminate foreign interference on 10 MHz. |
| S2-0411 |
None |
| S2-0412 |
Keep the WWV radio service and the Internet time service
exactly the way they are. |
| S2-0413 |
availability of Internet Time Service -- too often I can't connect to it when I want to use it |
| S2-0414 |
Reduction of HF interferance by unauthorized stations on
same fz. More subject to 10MHz fz. Many bcast stns have been noted on or
very near this fz making it useless. Other interferance noted are ALE tx
and 'tune' cycles by transmitters. |
| S2-0415 |
Increase Power or change footprint for E. Coast
Improvement. |
| S2-0416 |
Coverage |
| S2-0417 |
"Sometimes the person reading the STI's doesn't have
enough time for all the data & is cut off, with no chance of getting
the missing data. Why not extend it to 19 min. past hour if necessary
during high solar activity?? " |
| S2-0418 |
Coverage |
| S2-0419 |
You've done perhaps the best job any citizen can expect of
his/her government ... don't stop |
| S2-0420 |
Coverage in Alaska for the radio clocks |
| S2-0421 |
None |
| S2-0422 |
All is great! |
| S2-0423 |
Boost power of WWVB. |
| S2-0424 |
n/a |
| S2-0425 |
"20 mHz coverage, and reactivate 25 mHz
operation." |
| S2-0426 |
I am basicly happy with the current services provided |
| S2-0427 |
Return of the 25 MHz WWV & WWVH transmissions |
| S2-0428 |
|
| S2-0429 |
none |
| S2-0430 |
"WWVB reception has had some interference problems in
the Newark, Delaware area in the past" |
| S2-0431 |
Reliable reception anywhere in the USA at any time of day
or night. |
| S2-0432 |
None |
| S2-0433 |
none needed |
| S2-0434 |
Voice announcements of propagation
often difficult to hear due to poor diction of speakers. |
| S2-0435 |
WWVB coverage area needs improvement. should be able to get
it anywhere in US. |
| S2-0436 |
I'm using NISTIME. |
| S2-0437 |
Needs no improvement. It ain't broke;don't fix it. |
| S2-0438 |
Remove the phase shift at 10 min past the hour on WWVB.
This confuses phase comparison monitoring. |
| S2-0439 |
more frequent (than 1 minute) voice notification |
| S2-0440 |
Signal strength |
| S2-0441 |
2.5 and 5.0 are not often useful in Houston |
| S2-0442 |
60Khz-VLF Reception Reliability & 2.5 & 5.0Mhz
Reception Reliability |
| S2-0443 |
announcements |
| S2-0444 |
"I am quite happy with the present service, it has
always been quite good." |
| S2-0445 |
Daytime power/antenna at 10MHz |
| S2-0446 |
Would prefer solar/geomagnetic updates to be more frequent |
| S2-0447 |
"I am often VERY dependent on the hurricane report
that comes at 8 minutes after the hour.
Please consider repeating critical position information, and ensure
the announcer enunciates clearly." |
| S2-0448 |
Would like to see global indices more than once per hour. |
| S2-0449 |
I find WWV service to be very satisfactory. |
| S2-0450 |
N/A |
| S2-0451 |
WWVB needs more power to use atomic clocks in a tin
building |
| S2-0452 |
IN DEPTH GEO AND SOLAR INFORMATION . RADIO PROPAGATIONS UP
TOO 144 MEGAHERTZ. |
| S2-0453 |
"None.....you do a great job, just keep doing
it." |
| S2-0454 |
"If you offered me a free HP cesium beam time/freq
standard in exchange for the RF broadcasts, I would turn you down.
Keep the RF broadcasts. They
are the ultimate portable freq reference. " |
| S2-0455 |
Additional power for the 2.5mHz and 20mHz services to the
ConUS |
| S2-0456 |
Even more power on 60khz wwvb would be great. |
| S2-0457 |
You are doing an EXCELLENT job as is. I use you for my SWL
and Amateur Radio hobbies. |
| S2-0458 |
OK as is. |
| S2-0459 |
A modulated CW time broadcast would improve reception
during periods of marginal propagation. |
| S2-0460 |
"The WWVB 60khz signal needs to be stronger, so my
WWVB clock can receive the low freq signal indoors." |
| S2-0461 |
Perfectly OK as is. Find
no fault at all. |
| S2-0462 |
NONE |
| S2-0463 |
None. |
| S2-0464 |
I sometimes miss the 25Mc signal. |
| S2-0465 |
"60 kHz coverage has been improved, but one can wish
for coverage in AK & HI...." |
| S2-0466 |
It would be nice to see increased coverage for both the HF
service and 60 kHz. |
| S2-0467 |
Improved coverage of 2.5MHz transmitter into the NE US at
night. |
| S2-0468 |
Satisfied for my needs. |
| S2-0469 |
"ON giving the time, voice difficult to copy.
Conditions, interference from foreign statinos" |
| S2-0470 |
I am very happy with the service the way it is |
| S2-0471 |
Improve WWVB coverage on East Coast. |
| S2-0472 |
"The radio medium is PERFECT.
No internet access in remote locations, nor telephone either!" |
| S2-0473 |
Internet time service |
| S2-0474 |
Keep all shortwave servives. I use 5 10 & 15 mhz as a
time reference for shortwave radio recordings. |
| S2-0475 |
Time broadcast and phone service. |
| S2-0476 |
Full Julian date as well. |
| S2-0477 |
more weather would be nice |
| S2-0478 |
Propogation bulletins given more frequently than once per
hour at 18 minutes after the hour. |
| S2-0479 |
WWVB coverage in Florida and New York City |
| S2-0480 |
None. |
| S2-0481 |
Reception |
| S2-0482 |
"Perhaps more frequent solar-terrestrial indices, more
detailed """"space
weather""""" |
| S2-0483 |
Additional time slots for more extensive maritime weather
& solar-terrestrial indices |
| S2-0484 |
WWVB reception/coverage on the East Coast. |
| S2-0485 |
Reception Reliability and better coverage. |
| S2-0486 |
nil |
| S2-0487 |
I would like to use 2.5 and 5.0Mhz but reception is
marginal. 10Mhz is excellent. |
| S2-0488 |
WWVB needs more power/coverage in the Los Angeles/So.
Calif. area. |
| S2-0489 |
It would be nice to have improved coverage on some of the
lower frequency bands. |
| S2-0490 |
there are
times when the signal is not strong enough here in New Jersey |
| S2-0491 |
None |
| S2-0492 |
Present system sufficiently fills my needs. |
| S2-0493 |
"Internation inforcement to keep the designated time
frequencies off limits to two-way radio users.
The frequency 10MHz is has very heavy QRM from asain fishing, etc.
PS: I am located in Guam." |
| S2-0494 |
None |
| S2-0495 |
None |
| S2-0496 |
Service is fine for my purposes. |
| S2-0497 |
More frequent geo-alert announcements--at least twice an
hour |
| S2-0498 |
Present services
are excellent. |
| S2-0499 |
WWVB Coverage during daytime. Increase power. |
