|
|
A
compact calcium magneto-optic trap
|
|

Introduction
As we set out to construct
a relatively compact magneto-optic trap (MOT) for Ca, we were faced with two
main challenges. One was to construct a diode-laser-based system to generate sufficient
light power at 423 nm for excitation of the 1S0 → 1P1
cooling transition. A second was to find
a simple MOT design which would work efficiently for Ca. Unfortunately, the
simplest form of atom trap, the vapor cell MOT, is difficult to apply to alkaline
earth atoms such as Ca due to the high temperatures (>300°C) required for adequate vapor
pressure. For this reason, the first Ca MOTs
were loaded with atoms from Zeeman-slowed atomic
beams. While these traps performed well, they were large and required strong
magnetic fields. We decided to try instead a modified version
of a trap design which was first demonstrated for lithium at Stanford (see
Brian P. Anderson and Mark A. Kasevich, Phys. Rev. A 50,
R3581 (1994)) and subsequently for Ca at PTB and NIST. This design
forgoes the use of the Zeeman slower and relies
instead on catching only the slow atoms from the atomic beam. To
compensate the reduced velocity capture range, we place the trap as close to
the atomic source as possible, so as to have a large atom flux through the
trapping region.
In
our present version (see the figure below) the trap center is located 13 cm
from the oven. The oven, which we operate at ~600°C, has a nozzle (1 mm diameter, 1 cm long) which serves as the
only beam-collimating aperture in the system. The cylindrical vacuum
chamber of the trapping region (10 cm in diameter) has eight windows in
addition to entry and exit ports for the atomic beam. Four of these
windows are set in the horizontal plane at 45°
relative to the atomic beam. There is a pair of larger horizontally
oriented windows (perpendicular to the atomic beam) which are
anti-reflection-coated for 657 nm and 423 nm to transmit red and blue
probes. We use a pair of vertically oriented windows for trapping beams
and fluorescence collection. Due to the broad trapping transition, the
trap requires a large magnetic field gradient (6
to 10 mT/cm), which we generate using
water-cooled coils (100 turns carrying 12 amps).
With about 10 mW per retroreflected
vertical beam and 2 mW for the retroreflected
horizontal beam, we can trap ~106 atoms in 20 ms for a trap detuning
of -30 MHz (see photograph at top of trapped atoms scattering trapping laser
light). The trap lifetime is limited to ~20 ms by optical pumping to the 1D2
state (see the level diagram), from which an atom decays 25% of the time to the
extremely long-lived 3P2 level, and thus falling out of
the trap. Otherwise an atom will decay to the 3P1
level and back to the ground state on a time scale (3.5 ms) which gives a good
probability for recapture. We have been able to increase the trap
lifetime (and thus the equilibrium trap number) by as much as a factor of 9 by
optically pumping atoms out of the 1D2 state with light
from an additional diode laser at 672 nm (see the level diagram at top).
Another
approach for increasing the equilibrium number of atoms is to increase the
loading rate by accessing a larger portion of the atomic beam’s velocity
distribution. To this end we have added a slowing beam tuned 110 MHz
below resonance, which is aligned counter-propagating to the atomic beam.
Interestingly, we find the greatest increase in trapped atom number when we
transfer most of the power from the trapping beams (still detuned 30 MHz to red
of the transition) to the slowing beam. Our present version uses ~12 mW in the slowing beam and ~1 mW
in each trapping beam. Even without a special Zeeman
slower, this beam still slows enough atoms in 13 cm that our loading rate
increases by an order of magnitude. With our modified "loaded"
trap, we can accumulate ~107 atoms in 70 ms. In fact, though
they are far from optimal for slowing the atomic beam, our large diameter
trapping coils act as a crude Zeeman slower.
The evidence for this is that we see an improvement (x2) in the loading rate
when we switch the polarization of our slowing beam from linear to the
"correct" circular. Conversely, we see no increase in the
loading rate for the opposite circular polarization.
The
resultant temperature for our cold Ca sample is typically a few mK, much larger than that for
alkali atom traps. This is a consequence of the lack of Zeeman structure in our J=0 ground state, which precludes
sub-Doppler cooling mechanisms. Furthermore, the large linewidth of the cooling transition leads to a large
Doppler-cooling limit, which for Ca is 0.8 mK, corresponding to a root-mean-squared velocity (vrms) of 42 cm/s. We can readily measure the
velocity distributions of our cold atoms using the first-order Doppler shift on
the narrow red transition. In the figure above we show a typical velocity
distribution, measured for a trapping laser detuning of -28 MHz. This lineshape closely resembles a thermal distribution with a vrms of 69 cm/s, corresponding to a temperature
of 2.2 mK. These comparatively warm temperatures
for alkaline atom cooling have important implications for our spectroscopic
investigations.